Justice, Interrupted: The Effect of Gender, Ideology and Seniority at Supreme Court Oral Arguments by Tonja Jacobi, Dylan Schweers :: SSRN
Shared by Simon HarrisWe find that judicial interactions at oral argument are highly gendered, with women being interrupted at disproportionate rates by their male colleagues, as well as by male advocates. Oral argument interruptions are also highly ideological, not only because ideological foes interrupt each other far more than ideological allies do, but we show that conservatives interrupt liberals more frequently than vice versa.